What is often the consequence when a bill is passed through both houses of Congress but contains amendments?

When a bill is passed through both houses of Congress but has amendments, it often results in the need for a conference committee to resolve any discrepancies. This situation arises because the two houses may have different versions of the bill due to the amendments made during the legislative process. A conference committee, which consists of members from both the House of Representatives and the Senate, is convened to reconcile these differences and produce a unified version of the bill that both houses can agree upon. Once the conference committee reaches an agreement, the revised bill is sent back to both houses for a final vote, ensuring that any conflicting provisions are addressed before the legislation can be signed into law.

Consequently, the other options do not accurately reflect the typical legislative process. A bill is not immediately signed after passing both houses; it requires either a unifying version post-conference or further consideration. Additionally, the bill is not revoked as a standard procedure when amendments are present. Lastly, judicial review pertains to the power of courts to examine the constitutionality of laws and is not a direct consequence of amendments made to a bill in Congress.